Participatory Variety Selection and Promotion of Improved Soybean (Glycine max L.) Variety in Northwestern Ethiopia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29244/jtcs.12.01.206-214Keywords:
improved soybean varieties, varietal preference analysisAbstract
A participatory variety selection (PVS) approach was used to evaluate the varieties when selecting new soybean varieties. Farmers were requested to state the most important traits when deciding which soybean varieties to adopt. The study aimed to identify a high-yielding variety that fulfills farmers’ preferences, creates wider demand, and strengthens linkage among the possible actors in improved soybean varieties. The study was conducted at Jawe, Guangua, and North Achefer locations in the Awi and West Gojam zones during the 2018 and 2019 cropping seasons. Eight improved soybean varieties were considered in the experiment. Farmers identified seven biological attributes as their selection criteria and considered social factors when deciding which variety to grow. High grain yields of 1830 kg.ha-1 and 1680 kg.ha-1 were recorded for varieties “Pawe-02” and “Wegayen,” respectively, whereas the lowest grain yield of 1430 kg.ha-1 was recorded for the variety “Ethio-Yugoslavia.” “Pawe-02” variety was ranked 1st by farmers’ selection in two districts among the eight varieties. The average performance of the “Pawe-02” variety in the pre-scale-up activity was 2580 kg.ha-1 with a yield advantage of 48.87%. Likert-scale analysis indicated that farmers positively perceived the important traits “Pawe-02” against the existing soya bean variety. Therefore, the “Pawe-02” variety should be recommended to farmers on a large scale to benefit them in this study area and similar agroecology.
References
Agegn, A., Bitew, Y., and Ayalew, D. (2022). Response of yield and quality of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] varieties to blended NPSZnB fertilizer rates in northwestern Ethiopia. Heliyon 8, 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09499.
Alemayehu, A., Animut, T., Awol, M., Daniel, T., Ermias, A., Sewagegn, T., Yazie, C., and Zeynu, T. (2021). “Guideline for Participatory Varietal Selection 2018”. Amhara Agricultural Research Institute, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
Atif, A. (2023). The determinants of food insecurity among developing countries: are there any differences? Scientific African 19, e01512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01512.
Begna, T. (2022). Importance of participatory variety selection and participatory plant breeding in variety development and adoption. Advanced Crop Science Technology 10, 497 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbio.20221002.11.
Buah, S.S.J., Denwar, N.N., Kanton, R.A.L., and Kombiok, J.M. (2020). Participatory approach to variety selection using soybean production in Ghana as a model. West African Journal of Applied Ecology 28, 14-30.
De Boef, W.S., and Thijssen, M.H. (2007). Participatory tools working with crops, varieties, and seeds. A guide for professionals applying participatory approaches in agrobiodiversity management, crop improvement, and seed sector development. Wageningen International 1-83. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239846985.
Deresse, H., and Gezahegn, T. (2018). Participatory varietal selection and evaluation of twelve soybean varieties for lowland areas of northwestern Ethiopia. International Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science 5, 403-407.
Ethiopian Agriculture Authority (EAA). (2022). “Crop Variety Register 25”. Plant Variety Release, Protection, and Seed Quality Control Directorate. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[FAO] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2020). “Food Outlook: Biannual Report on Global Food Markets”. November 2020.
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology 22, 55.
Lilja, N., and Ashby, J. (2001). Overview: Assessing the impact of using participatory research and gender/stakeholder analysis In “The impact of participatory research and gender analysis” (N. Lilja and I. Ashby, eds.), pp 7-9, Cali, Colombia. International center for tropical agriculture (CIAT).
Lokot, M., Hartman, E., and Hashmi, I. (2023). Participatory approaches and methods in gender equality and gender-based violence research with refugees and internally displaced populations: a scoping review. Conflict and Health 17, 58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-023-00554-5.
Mekonnen, A., Getnet, M., Nebiyu, A., et al. (2022). Quantifying potential yield and yield gaps of soybean using CROPGRO-soybean model in the humid tropics of southwestern Ethiopia. International Journal of Plant Production 16, 653–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-022-00218-z.
Ritchie, H. (2021). “Is Our Appetite for Soy Driving Deforestation in the Amazon? Our World in Data.” https://ourworldindata.org/soy.
SAS. (2013). “System Analysis Software.Version 9.4”. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA.
Tehulie, N.S., Misgan, T., and Awok, T. (2021). Review of weeds and weed controlling methods in soybean (Glycine max L.). Journal of Current Research in Food Science, 2709-9385.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All publications by Journal of Tropical Crop Science is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.